- From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:55:54 +0200
- To: "Phil Archer" <parcher@icra.org>, <public-bpwg-pro@w3.org>
Hi, I'd be for that. Question, also in view of your reworked tests and the feedback given: How do we capture worthwhile suggestions and how do we decide to implement them? Kai > -----Original Message----- > From: public-bpwg-pro-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-bpwg-pro-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Phil Archer > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:23 AM > To: public-bpwg-pro@w3.org > Subject: Re: Missed phone conference > > > > > Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich wrote: > [..] > > > > > > Shall we cancel the call until there is a clear need and > schedule at > > this time upon demand? > > > > I would prefer that. > > We can do that as long as: > > 1. The list continues to be active and we can show progress > with the document (which we can this week, for example) 2. > We're not giving more ammunition to those who think we're all > wasting our time anyway. > > Having action items (with deadlines) helps concentrate the mind. > > How about this as a next batch of action items for us all: > > 1. Someone does Dan's tests (4.27 - 4.31). With the greatest > of respect and personal liking for Mr Appelquist, I know he > won't mind me saying that he's crap at doing his action items. > > 2. We each now review a batch of tests that someone else did > (including any e-mail comments they may have made ;-)) Where > things need actual resolutions - such resolutions can be > posted to the list. > > 3. Let's see if we can work towards having a version of the > doc sans-issues and editorial notes within a given time frame. > > P > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 14:56:39 UTC