- From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:09:17 +0000
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
Luca No-one is suggesting what application/xhtml+xml be disregarded, and it's listed as a good heuristic to use in CTG. The difference of opinion here is over whether it's sufficiently good to be promoted beyond a heuristic to be mandatory. Tom On 8 Jan 2009, at 15:57, Luca Passani wrote: > I think we are forgetting one basic requirements here. Transcoders > must err on the side of not transcoding whenever in doubt. I still > think that application/xhtml+xml is a strong indicator that the > content is probably already suitable for mobile. If W3C does not > want to take it as an absolute indicator, then you may want to > compromise on something like: > > If MIME-Type=application/xhtml+xml > AND > SIZE <= 20kb > AND > No Web-only tags such as iframe nor complex HTML/Javascript > > THEN => MOBILE CONTENT (Do Not Touch) > > this would still be a much better heuristics than disregarding > application/xhtml+xml altogether. -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.org
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 16:10:02 UTC