- From: Sean Patterson <SPatterson@Novarra.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:01:44 -0500
- To: "public-bpwg-ct" <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <24889886D84B794A9259323D7354CF33076C61E4@novarrainet2.internalnt.novarra.com>
Comment: 4) Section 4.3.6. Complete the statement: "the URI of the response (following redirection or as indicated by the Content-Location HTTP header) indicates that the resource is intended for mobile use (e.g. the domain is *.mobi, wap.*, m.*, mobile.*" ADD: , pda.*, imode.*, iphone.*, "or the leading portion of the path is /m/ or /mobile/);" Rationale: URL with pattern imode.* and pda.* have been in use for many years, and unambiguously indicate sites that are optimized for i-Mode devices or for PDA (Palm, PPC, IEMobile). URL of the form iphone.* have started to appear, providing experience specifically tailored to i-Phones; they do not need, and should not be transformed either. Proposed Response: imode.* was covered in LC-2022. iphone.* was covered in LC-2002. For, *.pda, I think the same rationale as for imode.* and iphone.* applies. For PDA devices, this is probably a useful heuristic. However, if a non-PDA device requests a pda.* page, it may make sense for the CT proxy to transform the content so that the content is viewable on the non-PDA device. As for <domain>/m/* or <domain>/mobile/* being used as heuristics, these seem quite reasonable to me. Sean
Received on Sunday, 19 October 2008 21:04:40 UTC