- From: Tom Hume <Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:02:35 +0100
- To: Rotan Hanrahan <Rotan.Hanrahan@MobileAware.com>
- Cc: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 23:16:30 UTC
Does this imply that transcoding proxies shouldn't transcode items of content with MIME types that is "text/xml, application/xml or ends in +xml (ignoring any parameters)" (the ones referred to in the XHR standard)? On 16 Oct 2008, at 23:51, Rotan Hanrahan wrote: > In these scenarios, mobile Ajax should stick to raw text, XML or > JSON as a payload format. If it is communicating with fragments of > HTML and you've already adapted (or otherwise "enhanced") the page > in which the Ajax is operating, the chances of that fragment of HTML > being of any use any more (adapted or not) are significantly > diminished already. > > Good point about the UA though. I must double-check. -- Future Platforms Ltd e: Tom.Hume@futureplatforms.com t: +44 (0) 1273 819038 m: +44 (0) 7971 781422 company: www.futureplatforms.com personal: tomhume.org
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 23:16:30 UTC