- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:53:15 +0200
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
I've been masquerading my User-Agent header lately to browse the Web, using a non-existing User-Agent with no link whatsoever to any existing one. I was expecting to see things break one way or the other, but the thing is I had no real problem so far. I see a few sites that return an "application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml" content-type that is not recognized by my browser, but this typically is an indication that they have a mobile-optimized version, so not what I would consider to be a big problem. So I'm wondering. Can anyone point out a few web sites that returns a rejected response when queried with a "weird" User-Agent? (either through a 406 status, or through a 200 status code with a "sorry" message) I suppose I'm only browsing modern Web sites, not "legacy" ones. Thanks, Francois.
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 14:53:49 UTC