- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:13:09 +0100
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
Hi guys, I'm enjoying a few days off, and must confess I preferred skiing to CT-ing during that time... I suggest we move forward with the parts of the drafts not resolved/reviewed yet. Note to US residents: the call is still one hour later than it was before. ----- Chair: François Staff Contact: François Known regrets: Jo Date: 2008-03-18T1500Z for 60mn Phone: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152 Conference code: 2283 ("BCTF") followed by # key IRC channel: #bpwg on irc.w3.org, port 6665. Latest draft: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080313 (Thanks for this new draft, Jo!) Agenda: 1. Reminder: actions -------------------- http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/12 2. HTTPS rewrite (in §3.4) -------------------------- - Review of Andrew's contribution (ACTION-633), adapted by Jo in latest draft: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Feb/0026.html 3. Cache-control: no-transform and WAP gateways (in §1.2 and §3.2) ------------------------------------------------------------------ - Review of fd contribution (ACTION-634) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Feb/0011.html (and replies) 4. Server Response to Proxy (§3.2) ---------------------------------- http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080227#sec-ServerResponse - recommend the use of the HTTP Vary header - references to POWDER - recommend the use of <link> elements? - HTTP-300 and/or give the user a choice of representations 5. Proxy Receipt and Forwarding of Response from Server (§3.3) -------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080227#d0e508 - how does that fit with the content tasting approach? 6. Proxy Response to Client (§3.4) ---------------------------------- http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080227#d0e521 - how to advertise transformations done? Suggestions: + using the VIA header + using the PRAGMA header + don't advertise - heuristics: anything else? (detection of mobile-friendly patterns in the URI? More on link elements?) - resolution on dangerous content. 7. Further discussions / open questions if time allows ------------------------------------------------------ - Impact on sites that use redirections from the home page rather than adaptation? - CT and redirections: use cases - Requirements: things we can't address with existing technologies.
Received on Sunday, 16 March 2008 22:10:02 UTC