- From: Gerlach, Heiko, VF-Group <Heiko.Gerlach@vodafone.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:11:13 +0200
- To: <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E71B6B341C8C3D47AA1288D9E719D1C55522A4@VF-MBX12.internal.vodafone.com>
Send a proposal on using meta data to alert CT-proxy that this is a rejected response even if it's a 200 [on Heiko Gerlach - due 2008-06-17]. Hi All, Background: When a site owner decides to return 200 OK (instead of 406) and presents an error message in well formed html and human language we won't be able to determine this automatically. The Idea was to insert additional Meta Tags into the Head of the HTML document. I was rethinking that Idea. The major issue I see is that in opposite to made for mobile site it might be difficult to find the stakeholders for non made for mobile site which shall be content adapted and returning 200OK instead of 406. If we do not know them we can not recommend them to add the Meta Tag. If we decide to introduce the additional Meta Tag, I recommend to introduce a http-response tag, which can carry the original HTTP Response code we would expect e.g. <meta http-response="406"> Best Regards Heiko Gerlach Vendor Manager / Product Owner Global Consumer Internet Services & Platforms Tel: +49 211 820 2168 Fax: +49 211 820 2141 Mobile +49 172 20 40 50 7 E-Mail: heiko.gerlach@vodafone.com Vodafone Group Services GmbH Mannesmannufer 2, D-40213 Düsseldorf Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 53554 Geschäftsführung: Dr. Joachim Peters, Rainer Wallek This message and any files or documents attached are confidential and may also be legally privileged or protected by other legal rules. It is intended only for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee or you have received this email in error, please inform the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy or disclose it or its contents or use it for any purpose. Thank you. Please also note that transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:12:24 UTC