- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:54:13 +0100
- To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
Hi, This is the proposed agenda for tomorrow's teleconf: Chair: François Staff Contact: François Known regrets: none Date: 2008-02-05T1500Z for 60mn Phone: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152 Conference code: 2283 ("BCTF") followed by # key IRC channel: #bpwg on irc.w3.org, port 6665. Most of the topics are based on: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Feb/0000.html and replies. Agenda: 1. Next call ------------ I'll be at MWC'08 next week. I guess I'm not the only one. -> cancel next call? 2. CT-proxy vs CT-gateway ------------------------- - do we need to make the distinction? - possibility to override the User-Agent header? - differences apart from the possibility to override the User-Agent header. - if it confuses us, it will confuse readers, so we need to be clear on our definition. 3. HTTP Cache-Control extensions -------------------------------- - write and submit an IETF draft? timeframe? - extensions needed -> ACTION-603 on fd 4. Preferred-medium directive ----------------------------- - use-cases? - link to CT: isn't the feature more generic, that is between the end-user and the server, no matter if there's a proxy in-between? - link to content-negotiation: should we push for the use of HTTP 300 and/or RFC 2295 knowing it's not widely implemented? http://www.rfc.net/rfc2616.html#s10.3.1 http://rfc.net/rfc2295.html - solution: new HTTP header, DDR attribute, something else? 5. @@allow-https-rewrite directive ---------------------------------- - banking example - ACTION-633 on Andrew 6. User-Agent header modification and original user-agent --------------------------------------------------------- - do we need both? - solution: new HTTP header? 7. Cache-Control: no-transform, and "dangerous" content ------------------------------------------------------- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Jan/0022.html - proposed resolutions: no exception and add a [@@correct dangerous content] directive. Any objections? -> ACTION-625 on fd 8. Cache-Control: no-transform and WAP1 gateways ------------------------------------------------ -> ACTION-634 on fd 9. User-agent detection from a proxy and browser's point of view ---------------------------------------------------------------- -> ACTION-632 on Bryan 10. Use case analysis (part 4.) ------------------------------- - We must check that fall-back behavior works in all cases. - Who's to take care of that part? 11. AOB ------- - review pending ACTION-606 and ACTION-607 on Heiko - anything else? François.
Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 09:54:25 UTC