- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:50:15 +0100
- To: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
Hi, A few comments on the Landscape document: * I would drop the "1.0" from the title; it's unlikely the document will need to be versioned down to that level - most likely, once it gets approved as final, it won't be revised, and if it is, it can be revised under the same title * the presentation of the requirements between 10 and 11 (linking back to req 6) is a bit confusing; I would simply put a sentence saying that the said aspect is covered by req 6 * there should probably be ref to the TAG finding: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery.html * all the requirements are of the "must" form (although it's not clear whether that's meant in the RFC2119 sense); I'm not sure imposing so many must can leave any space for a real-world solution :) * the requirements all apply to servers/proxies/browsers/etc, while I think what is meant is requirements on what the guidelines document would address; e.g. I would rephrase: "Origin servers must be able to selectively enable or disable features of transforming proxies." in "The guidelines should address how origin servers can enable or disable features of transforming proxies" HTH, Dom
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 09:50:44 UTC