- From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:46:57 +0100
- To: <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>
Hi folks I apologise for not producing this according to my original estimate but here it is now. I am hoping that it is pretty much all but complete. The changes in this revision are relatively major, I'd especially appreciate critical eyes on the restatement of the requirements - to make sure that everything that was in the previous version is still there, etc. The changes are: Alan Chuter's Comments - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0035.html >From Adam - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0034.html Bryan Sullivan's comments - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0033.html (ISSUE-221) ACTION-565 amplify abstract to make clear that it is a "problem statement" ACTION-564 include Magnus's screed on HTTP protocol as part of section 3. ACTION-563 fold what was section 2 into what was section 1 (now both become section 2 and an all-new-for-the-Autumn-season section 1 has been introduced) You'll find the new version at [1], the previous version is at [2]. Please send comments asap and hopefully we can resolve to publish Tuesday next week. Jo [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Probl emStatement/071002 [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Probl emStatement/070911
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 12:47:33 UTC