- From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:03:40 -0700
- To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <44C9626C.6030204@w3.org>
Hello, Congratulations on your First Public Working Draft [1] for mobileOK. A comment for 2.2: "If the document's MIME type, as specified in the HTTP response Content-Type header, is not application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml or application/xhtml+wml , FAIL" These are called Internet Media Types (rather than MIME I think) and are not registered. Are you planning to register them? I am not an expert but am checking to see if mobileOK requires XHTML Basic and Basic requires application/xhtml+xml. "If the document's DOCTYPE's PUBLIC identifier is not an XHTML Basic identifier (at present, "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.1//EN" or "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"), FAIL" In case the references help, the topic came up in March of 2004 on two different W3C lists [2,3]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobileOK-20060712/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Mar/0001 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Mar/0000 Hope this helps, -- Susan Lesch http://www.w3.org/People/Lesch/ mailto:lesch@w3.org tel:+1.612.216.2436 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 01:03:42 UTC