- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:42:46 +0200
- To: "Mobile Web Accessibility Task Force" <public-bpwg-access@w3.org>
I have been working through the Best Practices document to understand the relationships between the BPs and the WCAG 1.0 checkpoints. doing this, I began to wonder whether the references "This relates to WCAG n.n" are useful, or not perhaps misleading. For example, COLOR_CONTRAST [1] and USE_OF_COLOR [2] are grouped together and there is a reference "This relates to WCAG 2.1 and 2.2". There are two BPs and two CPs, but the reference doesn't say which BP relates to which CP. More importantly, the BP is concerned with poor ambient lighting, colour coding of hyperlinks, and monochrome screens, while WCAG is more about "color deficits" (functional limitation of the user). Another example, IMAGE_MAPS [3] has a reference to WCAG CPs 1.2 and 9.1, but doesn't actually have anything in common with them except that they are about image maps. I feel that more explanation and qualification is needed, more than a simple cross-reference. When the Relationship between MWBP and WCAG 1.0 document is complete, it would be more useful, in a possible future version of the MWBPs to link to it and remove the cross-references. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#COLOR_CONTRAST [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#USE_OF_COLOR [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#IMAGE_MAPS Regards, -- Alan Chuter Accessibility Consultant Technosite (Fundación ONCE) achuter@technosite.es www.technosite.es Tel. +34 91 121 03 35 Skype: achuter1 If you are unable to reply to this message because of spam filter, try my alternative address achuter.technosite@yahoo.com. Si no puede contestar a este mensaje por culpa del filtro de spam, intente con mi dirección alternativa achuter.technosite@yahoo.com.
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 08:44:16 UTC