- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:42:24 +0200
- To: "Mobile Web Accessibility Task Force" <public-bpwg-access@w3.org>
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > CMN: Given that the text of the requirements is exactly the same, surely > fulfilling this correctly is exactly the same. (I thought it was...) Yes, the title of the checkpoint is the same, but the description is different (and mixed up with the other, LINK_TARGET_FORMAT, to make it even harder to understand). The BP is concerned with identifying the information in the target content, while WCAG is also and more concerned about the link text being meaningful when read in a list of links. WCAG is also more comprehensive. The new document doesn't actually say that the BP is different in this respect, but simply says what an author should do in addition to comply with WCAG as well. That is mainly to consider how the person interacts with the content (like by using a screen reader). -- Alan Chuter Accessibility Consultant Technosite (Fundación ONCE) achuter@technosite.es www.technosite.es Tel. +34 91 121 03 35 Skype: achuter1 If you are unable to reply to this message because of spam filter, try my alternative address achuter.technosite@yahoo.com. Si no puede contestar a este mensaje por culpa del filtro de spam, intente con mi dirección alternativa achuter.technosite@yahoo.com.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 14:43:41 UTC