- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:12:12 +0100
- To: achuter@technosite.es, "Mobile Web Accessibility Task Force" <public-bpwg-access@w3.org>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:42:24 +0200, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> CMN: Given that the text of the requirements is exactly the same,
>> surely fulfilling this correctly is exactly the same. (I thought it
>> was...)
>
> Yes, the title of the checkpoint is the same, but the description is
> different (and mixed up with the other, LINK_TARGET_FORMAT, to make it
> even harder to understand). The BP is concerned with identifying the
> information in the target content, while WCAG is also and more concerned
> about the link text being meaningful when read in a list of links. WCAG
> is also more comprehensive.
>
> The new document doesn't actually say that the BP is different in this
> respect, but simply says what an author should do in addition to comply
> with WCAG as well. That is mainly to consider how the person interacts
> with the content (like by using a screen reader).
OK.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 17:12:52 UTC