- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:12:13 +0100
- To: achuter@technosite.es, "Mobile Web Accessibility Task Force" <public-bpwg-access@w3.org>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:59:46 +0200, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> CMN: No, the working group did consider mobile content although didn't >> talk about it a lot. But I think it is true that the requirements are >> very closely related. > > I've removed the comment and reworded it like this: > "Does it give me WCAG 1.0 compliance?: No, but this BP goes some way > toward complying with WCAG 1.0 checkpoint 12.3, “Divide large blocks of > information into more manageable groups where natural and appropriate”. > However the WCAG checkpoint is much broader in scope, covering all usage > contexts." Yes, that looks like a good way of doing it. thanks Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 17:12:51 UTC