W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpmlod@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [bpmlod] next meeting: best practices on NAMING (18th September)

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:32:18 +0500
To: "public-bpmlod@w3.org" <public-bpmlod@w3.org>, "Jorge Gracia" <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
Message-ID: <op.w3ki34fwy3oazb@chaals.local>
Regrets - I will be in another meeting then.

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:10:19 +0500, Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es> wrote:

> 1) Patterns and best practices for Naming: Descriptive/opaque URIs,
> full IRIs, internationalised local names, language in URIs.
> We will use the table at [2] as basis for the discussion (feel free to
> add anything to it). The idea is to review the different patterns,
> analyse their advantages/disadvantages and decide which ones are best
> practices for multilingual linked data

I think it is pretty important to *describe* stuff. I put a note to that  
effect on the page. I also think it is really valuable to have examples of  
what is and *what*isn't* correct usage.

I actually think it is more useful to list the benefits and drawbacks for  
each approach, without trying to pick "the best practice" - different  
situations might still match different approaches better...



> 2) Plan for next meeting.
> Regards,
> Jorge
> [1]  
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=BPMLOD+conf+call&iso=20130918T13&ah=1
> [2]  
> http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/wiki/Best_practises_-_previous_notes

Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 18:32:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:45:36 UTC