W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-blockchain@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Minutes 15.03.

From: Dr. Nick Lee <nicklee@konkuk.ac.kr>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:15:23 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMCAVd-86BowQEqvhKA0aONrty-ZYGG2N2ALFDMgri6jPvp6nA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>
Cc: Blockchain CG <public-blockchain@w3.org>, Marta <marta@blockstream.com>
I was not able to be in the meeting but I will carefully read the minutes.

Nick.


On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for a great discussion. Attached is the snapshot of the use-case
> document. Below are minutes from the meeting:
>
>
>
> Events
> 19-21.04 RWoT
> 24.04 F2F -> need to reschedule due to space
> 25.04 Canton F2F
> 26.04 - 28.04 IEEE S&P
> 29.04 IEEE S&B
> 30.04 - 04.05 Eurocrypt
>
> More details on F2F soon. Use-case document and Coleen’s work
>
> [08:21] <marta> More details on F2F soon. Use-case document and Coleen’s
> work. After the f2f we should come out with a ready use-case document and
> plan on which ones will we be working on
> [08:21] <marta> Coleen: we sent out the changed document according to our
> discussion last week
> [08:22] <marta> how can multiple industries contribute
> [08:22] <marta> visualize how things break down
> [08:22] <marta> level one as was
> [08:22] <marta> level two - backbone for everything below. Per Vicky's
> suggestion
> [08:23] <marta> things that are shared across many implementations
> [08:23] <marta> level 3 higher level sectors
> [08:24] <marta> sectors can be defined a bit different, currently its US
> centric, but not meant so, just I know the field. Should describe large
> economics sectors
> [08:24] <marta> level 4 companies
> [08:24] <marta> manu asked to pick use cases and merge
> [08:25] <marta> waiting for changes and inputs. I have done as much as I
> could
> [08:25] <marta> adrian> put audit and timestamps on level two
> [08:25] <marta> ...put them together, not much of a difference, probably
> [08:26] <marta> ... at level 5 in Health Care we have done a lot of work
> in VC around writing a prescription as a use-case. Its well understandable
> transaction and could map tp blockchain
> [08:27] <marta> coleen: does it mean that prescription is given to someone
> who should get it?
> [08:27] <marta> adrien: both issuer and receiver
> [08:27] <marta> ...has a comercial component (pharmacy), state interest
> component (legality), 2 actors (sides of transaction)
> [08:29] <marta> marta: blockchain is great for supply chain. Like part
> tracking.
> [08:29] <marta> coleen: good for counterfeiting
> [08:30] <marta> adrian: level 2 idea - systems that cross multiple
> blockchains. Transitioning in an atomic way. Moving one blockchain into
> another
> [08:31] <marta> ..."blockchain 2 blockchain"
> [08:32] <marta> adam: blockchain linking is a term I heard
> [08:32] <marta> adam: I added supply chain around fair trade certification
> [08:32] <marta> ... organic certification
> [08:33] <marta> coleen: can I do timestamps?
> [08:33] <adam> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BNKQ-
> hNFIpROyzQRig7a7kTBcmclAQlbv3MCCZfhHiE/edit#heading=h.i3vcpru00nyt
> [08:33] <marta> adam - its very last minute
> [08:34] == red40 [~red40@public.cloak] has quit [Client closed connection]
> [08:35] == ahaller2 [~ahaller2@public.cloak] has joined #blockchain
> [08:35] <marta> adrian: there is history command: "view last changes"
> [08:35] <marta> adam: changes as of today
> [08:36] <marta> ... I found that we're looking a lot at VC and
> blockchains. Will we merge it later?
> [08:37] <marta> ... added education which is close to VC. Also insurance
> use case - again quite a lot about claims
> [08:37] <marta> ... also one in identity
> [08:40] <marta> server compliance with certificates
> [08:42] == ahaller2 [~ahaller2@public.cloak] has quit [Ping timeout: 180
> seconds]
> [08:43] <marta> what are the next steps?
> [08:43] <marta> coleen will continue to refine
> [08:44] <marta> ...I won't make it to april f2f, but I will continue to
> work on it
> [08:44] <marta> ...till april
> [08:45] <marta> marta: email all requests you'd have
> [08:45] <marta> adam, what about use case document?
> [08:46] <marta> adam: is it OK to assume that there is an identity layer
> to those use-case
> [08:47] <marta> marta: yes, but also lets look at ones that dont
> [08:47] <marta> adam: what are the use cases that I have not defined?
> Please give feedback on
> [08:47] <marta> What are the use cases for the domains that we don't have
> UC defined for
> [08:48] <marta> Government Records, Real Estate, Financial Services,
> Identity Management
> [08:49] <marta> Problems with zoom.... OK I suggest we finish for today
> and agree to a meeting next week same time
>
>
>
> —
> Security Architect @ Blockstream
>
> mp@blockstream.com
>
> +491703311307 (Germany)
> +14159608938 (U.S.)
> Signal, Wickr (martap)
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 23:16:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 15 March 2017 23:16:18 UTC