Hi both, During the BioHackathon 2018 there was a group working on RNA and another one on Enzyme, they used encodesBioChemEntity and isEncodedByBioChemEntity as you can see on the draft profiles for RNA ( https://bioschemas.org/types/RNA/0.1-DRAFT-2019_06_21/) and Enzyme ( bioschemas.org/types/Enzyme/0.1-DRAFT-2019_06_20/). We do not know of any implementation yet (not surprising because they are in draft status) but the communities considered important having those properties so I guess there are use cases for them. Maybe someone who has worked on those profiles can say a bit more? Kind regards, On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:03 PM Chris Mungall <cjmungall@lbl.gov> wrote: > I'm not an expert on bioschemas, and I can't tell the intent of the > existing relation, but IMHO many molecular biologists would understand > encodes to be specifically the gene to protein relationship. > > I don't know if bioschemas is intended for representing the kind of > information you'd get in a GFF3 file, e.g central dogma > gene->transcript->protein, ncRNAs, regulatory regions. If so I'd be > interested in being involved and aligning with existing modeling efforts in > genomics (RO/SO, biolink). > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 9:10 AM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi folks >> >> Are there any cases where you want to use 'encodesBioChemEntity' to do >> something other than relate a Gene to a Protein? (or vice-versa with the >> inverse property isEncodedByBioChemEntity i.e. apply it to a >> non-Protein BioChemEntity)? >> >> Guillermo (cc:'d) has been exploring the use of bioschemas to capture >> lifescience data from Wikidata (starting with figure 1 of >> https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/799684v2.full.pdf) and this was >> one of the questions arising. >> >> Thanks for any guidance, >> >> cheers, >> >> Dan >> >
Received on Friday, 30 October 2020 16:05:30 UTC