- From: Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:38:56 +0000
- To: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-bioschemas@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAME9NR9TBjdY2Q9634pmAhMO4trqeMzDkq2j3a3CJtWgSEGoJA@mail.gmail.com>
Could Keneth or Ricardo comment on this? I think that BioChemEntity is a very important schema, as it's the one that allows a description of actual scientific entities, yet afaik there is * no clear example of usage * no documentation of how other ontologies terms would be used within it * or any actual use in the wild, as of yet. -- Justin Clark-Casey (http://justincc.org) RSE, Intermine, University of Cambridge ELIXIR UK node technical co-ordinator On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:16 AM, ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > I just realized no one seems to be involved in the BioChemEntity > specification, see http://bioschemas.org/types/Bi > oChemEntity/specification/ > > BioChemEntity was the agreed named for PhysicalEntity during the last > meeting in October. PhysicalEntity and DataRecord were defined during the > BioHackathon mainly between Michel Dumontier and myself, with collaboration > from Olga Giraldo and Alexander Garcia as well, taking into account > previous versions/alternatives of it. Both of them were presented in > October when all attendees discussed names, properties ans so on. > PhysicalEntity came from BiologicalEntity which I defined as part of the > work done for the Protein specification (that later evolved into a > profile). The BiologicalEntity was presented during the second meeting and > people liked it so it was adopted as a "metatype". It has been an effort > where multiple people have participated. > > Giving the history behind BioChemEntity, I am not sure v.0.1 is accurate. > For DataRecord v.0.1 seems right. > > And, there is no profile for it. There is probably no mandatory fields but > we still have recommendations regarding how to use > mainEntityOfPage/mainEntity in order to link to a DataRecord or url in > order to link to the official web page for this entity. > > I also think isContainedIn/contains could link to isPartOf/hasPart as > defined by the Relation Ontology. > > I know Keneth and Ricardo have been working on some improvements. Just let > me know if you need any extra help for BioChemEntity, I am happy to > collaborate. > > Regards, > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2018 18:39:21 UTC