W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > June 2018

Re: Bioschemas Taxon profile specification

From: Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:50:53 +0000
To: Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
CC: "fmichel@i3s.unice.fr" <fmichel@i3s.unice.fr>, LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F274805F-F716-4CD9-A7B1-3656B552C31A@hw.ac.uk>

On 27 Jun 2018, at 19:19, Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com<mailto:justinccdev@gmail.com>> wrote:

I think we should have mandatory known @types and properties.  In my view, Bioschemas should be as easy as possible to write and consume.  Multiple options will increase cognitive load on writers (which one do I choose?  Why are these 2 examples using these different terms?) and open the door to greater inconsistency.  Non-mandatory types will also raise the barriers for writing Bioschemas software that will have to be aware of equivalent mappings.

I completely agree that we should have a single approved type for each profile, and likewise for each property a single chosen term. This is the whole point of having the profiles.

I would go one step further and say that Bioschemas should provide an http://bioschemas.org<http://bioschemas.org/>context that will define types such as Taxon, rather than blessing particular ontology terms.

I also agree that a context file should be provided which has the chosen types and terms in it, i.e. the context file would define Protein to be the URI http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PR_000000001. To be completely explicit, we would not be defining a type in the bioschemas namespace, e.g. http://bioschemas.org/Protein.

This context can also document equivalent terms in different ontologies.

I like the idea that this also contains mappings to the equivalent terms in other ontologies.


Alasdair J G Gray
Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
Assistant Professor in Computer Science,
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
(Athena SWAN Bronze Award)
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK.

Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk<mailto:A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872
Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39
Twitter: @gray_alasdair


Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International University of the Year 2018

Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and the physical, social and life sciences.

This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which includes:

  1.  Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number SC000278
  2.  Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland, SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie, Midlothian, EH14 4AS
  3.  Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS.

The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system.
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2018 10:51:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:05 UTC