- From: Justin Clark-Casey <jc955@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:05:36 +0000
- To: public-bioschemas@w3.org
On 19/01/18 14:04, Gray, Alasdair J G wrote: >> >> Perhaps there could be 3 proposed projects. >> > Please add these to the document. Okay, I added "Bioschemas Common Crawl" and "SPARQL over Bioschemas" to the doc and somewhat rewrote the Buzzbang description. Federico, I put you down as a mentor of SPARQL (of course, please change the name and everything else as necessary). I put myself down as one potential mentor of "Bioschemas Common Crawl". There is a demarcation question here. In my description I have assumed that the crawl will put data into something with triplestore functionality and produce an RDF dump, but do no further processing (i.e. it is not attempting to construct a 'knowledge graph'). Further processing is left to downstream projects such as Buzzbang and SPARQL for now. One could argue that there should be one common knowledge graph but I see this as a very complex undertaking beyond the scope of a GSOC project at this point (to be honest, all these projects are already hard, imo). I put skills such as OWL, SPARQL, etc. down for SPARQL over bioschemas but as these are going to be pretty rare, I suggest making them optional if gsoc allows. -- Justin Clark-Casey Research Software Engineer, InterMine life sciences data integration, U of Cambridge http://twitter.com/justincc http://justincc.org
Received on Friday, 19 January 2018 17:06:22 UTC