- From: LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:49:13 +0000
- To: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk>, Melanie Courtot <mcourtot@ebi.ac.uk>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>, Matthew Green <hewgreen@ebi.ac.uk>, Luca Cherubin <cherubin@ebi.ac.uk>
Hi Melanie, There might be some confusion about the separation/link between entities and records. I added some comments to the document. I am happy to meet your team again if you think that could help. Last time we focused on Sample but did not talk about sample records. Regards, On 05/02/2018 11:04, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran wrote: > Hi Melanie, > > I added a suggestion that instead of defining a new relationship > "http://bioschemas.org/datasetUrl" as per the document, the Sample > information should reuse the 'https://schema.org/dataset' relationship > and point to the description of the dataset using the BioSchemas > Dataset specification (and thus the type 'https://schema.org/Dataset'). > > Then, this would require schema.org to expand the domain of > 'https://schema.org/dataset', although not sure how much the 'used on > these types' list is enforced. > > Thanks, > > Alejandra > > > On 05/02/2018 10:53, Melanie Courtot wrote: >> Dear bioschemers, >> >> Luca and Matt in my team have prepared an updated Samples profile >> proposal >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qLAl-JQ1vY-Vs0-xQUUbDaJ6lHtdUNzlh6CY1aUP9yg/edit#heading=h.ck5s4lynw6tk, >> with thanks to Leyla for her review. >> >> Comments would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Cheers, >> Melanie >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2018 17:49:50 UTC