- From: Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:15:39 +0300
- To: "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: "public-banana-rdf@w3.org" <public-banana-rdf@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 19:16:27 UTC
>I am for that Could you meanwhile look at all b-rdf issues opened by you and close those that are no longer relevant? 2015-07-13 21:48 GMT+03:00 henry.story@bblfish.net <henry.story@bblfish.net> : > > On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:17, Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Seems like the lack of good documentation is one of the main blockers of > banana-rdf adoption. I suggest that we should create static banana-rdf > website and put docs there. I do not care much about the technology unless > it is scala-based (no jekyll, pls). In my opition scalatext is the best > solution ( I even wrote some code > https://github.com/banana-rdf/banana-rdf/pull/290 ) but any scala-based > static generator will do. I also suggest to find some time to clean > outdated issues, it is not hard but will simplify further work a lot. > > > I am for that, but what about starting with filling the docs on the wiki. > That would get going quickly without worrying about tooling. ( Unless there > is something automated about the tooling that I am missing ) > > Henry > > > -- > Best regards, > Anton Kulaga > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > -- Best regards, Anton Kulaga
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 19:16:27 UTC