- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:48:11 +0100
- To: Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-banana-rdf@w3.org" <public-banana-rdf@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 18:48:43 UTC
> On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:17, Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Seems like the lack of good documentation is one of the main blockers of banana-rdf adoption. I suggest that we should create static banana-rdf website and put docs there. I do not care much about the technology unless it is scala-based (no jekyll, pls). In my opition scalatext is the best solution ( I even wrote some code https://github.com/banana-rdf/banana-rdf/pull/290 <https://github.com/banana-rdf/banana-rdf/pull/290> ) but any scala-based static generator will do. I also suggest to find some time to clean outdated issues, it is not hard but will simplify further work a lot. I am for that, but what about starting with filling the docs on the wiki. That would get going quickly without worrying about tooling. ( Unless there is something automated about the tooling that I am missing ) Henry > > -- > Best regards, > Anton Kulaga Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 13 July 2015 18:48:43 UTC