- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:31:11 +0100
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Jonathan, Thanks for all the hard work you put in here ... +1 to close and hopefully get some input to TAG. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 22 Oct 2011, at 02:15, Jonathan Rees wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >> I trust your judgement and will +1 whatever you think is best. > > Often I don't discover what I think until it comes out of my mouth. > That's why I find telcons and meetings helpful. > >> The documents produced are very good and in my mind, nice and >> clear. My only >> concern is with being GET 200 specific, so I'd be happy to have a >> final >> drive through to the end of the year to try to make it method, and >> potentially protocol, agnostic advise. If anybody else is up for it. > > Well I don't consider "retrieval" to be tied to GET 200 or even to > HTTP, and I have recently been always generalizing from GET/200 to > retrieval (a word used in RFC 3986). > > But your point is well taken and I haven't thought about it enough. > E.g. we have the analogous situation with using mailto: URIs to > 'identify' people, which you're not supposed to do but which someone > might be inclined to do. And I have been steadily worried about POST > in relation to HR14a. > > Best > Jonathan > >> Best, >> >> Nathan >> >> Jonathan Rees wrote: >>> >>> Quorum is 3. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> >>> Date: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM >>> Subject: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-09-27 >>> To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org> >>> >>> Agenda: >>> We need to just declare victory and shut the group down. >>> It's clear that given the low level of interest we're not going to >>> solve any more problems so let's just figure out what to report to >>> the >>> TAG. >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 08:32:07 UTC