Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-10-25

I trust your judgement and will +1 whatever you think is best.

The documents produced are very good and in my mind, nice and clear. My 
only concern is with being GET 200 specific, so I'd be happy to have a 
final drive through to the end of the year to try to make it method, and 
potentially protocol, agnostic advise. If anybody else is up for it.

Best,

Nathan

Jonathan Rees wrote:
> Quorum is 3.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Date: Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:34 PM
> Subject: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-09-27
> To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
> 
> Agenda:
> We need to just declare victory and shut the group down.
> It's clear that given the low level of interest we're not going to
> solve any more problems so let's just figure out what to report to the
> TAG.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 22:26:33 UTC