Re: Semantic web architectural requirement [was Re: Squaring the HTTP-range-14 circle]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
> [Moving this comment to the AWWSW list, as I think it will be more
> appropriate there.]

I'm not going to rule it out of order, but I'm not keen on discussing
this topic here for a couple of reasons. First, I don't see how it
advances our goal of producing an ontology that bears on web
architecture, and I would like to stay on task (see
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/). If anything *did* come of it, it
would be prescriptive and therefore out of charter for this group.
Second, you have brought it up many times before, there is no new
information this time around, and there never seems to be any progress
on it - I don't see anyone learning anything from the discussions, and
people just get angry at each other. This is wasteful of personal
energy and not good for morale, which is already too low.

I plan to move the issue-57 work back to www-tag. I appreciate all the
help I've received on it here but it's not the group's main purpose
any more. For me the problem that created this list is now solved and
we can move on and finish up. I suggest that any further discussion
here should be focussed on ontology building, even if it's only to
publish the single property that I think will be needed for issue-57.
I hope we can be done by the end of the year.

Jonathan

Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 11:58:04 UTC