- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 20:14:33 -0400
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Not normative -Alan On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: > Poking around the blogosphere I came across this: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-fragID > > which seems to contradict 3986 and webarch. According to this text, > if I have id="foo" in an XML document (not rdf+xml) at > http://example/x, then http://example/x does NOT refer to that XML > element, as it would according to 3986 and webarch. > > Worse, if there's RDF at that URI published as Turtle, then the Turtle > can't specify the meaning of a fragid, because Concepts says that > RDF/XML semantics applies. > > What a rathole! > > Nathan, I trust you'll be fixing this. Somehow. :) > > Jonathan >
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 00:15:15 UTC