- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:53:34 -0400
- To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Poking around the blogosphere I came across this: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-fragID which seems to contradict 3986 and webarch. According to this text, if I have id="foo" in an XML document (not rdf+xml) at http://example/x, then http://example/x does NOT refer to that XML element, as it would according to 3986 and webarch. Worse, if there's RDF at that URI published as Turtle, then the Turtle can't specify the meaning of a fragid, because Concepts says that RDF/XML semantics applies. What a rathole! Nathan, I trust you'll be fixing this. Somehow. :) Jonathan
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 21:54:07 UTC