- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:48:01 -0500
- To: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Hey, nobody caught my error... we had agreed to talk about HTTP-in-RDF today. http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswHttpVocabularyInRdfComments See you soon. On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: > We have a telecon scheduled for 9am, and I will assume this is OK with > people who want to watch the US presidential inauguration on > television, since the inauguration starts at 10. You can hang up the > phone and then rush to your TV or radio or other broadcast medium. If > you think you'll miss AWWSW on account of this event let me know - > that would mean maybe we should cancel. > > Agenda is continuing as before... but I really really would like to > find another use case where we can determine through formal (or less > desirably, informal) reasoning that an HTTP response says something > that is not true (or contradicts other intelligence). Ontology > building has to combine speculation with application, and we've been a > bit heavy on the speculation. > > Jonathan >
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 13:48:46 UTC