Re: AWWSW telecon, Tues Jan 20

Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> On 17/1/09 15:34, Jonathan Rees wrote:
>
>> Agenda is continuing as before...  but I really really would like to
>> find another use case where we can determine through formal (or less
>> desirably, informal) reasoning that an HTTP response says something
>> that is not true (or contradicts other intelligence). Ontology
>> building has to combine speculation with application, and we've been a
>> bit heavy on the speculation.
>
Another case, although it involves the metaphysically murky world of
information resources and the Semantic Web, is DanC's case here [1].

A variation on this, and a more realistic case could be, what URI should
I use when merging XFN and FOAF data?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/irw65/urisym.html

>

Received on Sunday, 18 January 2009 00:05:55 UTC