- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:06:48 +0000
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Jonathan, Neologism is for collaboratively editing RDF-S vocabularies. No OWL, no reasoning. But as it is build on Drupal it is very flexible and powerful. You work form-based and get next to the HTML view also the RDF/N3 and RDF/XML view 'for free'. However, I guess in combination with OwlSight [1] it may well be suitable. Cheers, Michael [1] http://pellet.owldl.com/ontology-browser -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:33:22 -0500 > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Self-intro and offer to support the process ... > > Thanks for the intro. > > On Feb 21, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> Btw, re vocabulary engineering: I gather that you're (still?) >> looking for a >> collaborative ontology engineering suite? Did you have a look at >> Neologism >> [3], yet? The four of us just recently did voiD [4] with it and are >> (beside >> minor issues) very happy with it. > > I'm as interested in proving statements true or false (under given > theories) and checking theories for mistakes and inconsistencies as in > writing down definitions. What we really need is something like > Protege 4 but on the web. Does Neologism support OWL? DL reasoning? > > Jonathan >
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 20:07:30 UTC