Re: Self-intro and offer to support the process ... from Jonathan Rees on 2009-02-21 (public-awwsw@w3.org from February 2009)

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:33:22 -0500
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8B4188C0-9AFB-4BC8-B6D9-FB5600D981B2@creativecommons.org>

Thanks for the intro.

On Feb 21, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:

> Btw, re vocabulary engineering: I gather that you're (still?)  
> looking for a
> collaborative ontology engineering suite? Did you have a look at  
> Neologism
> [3], yet? The four of us just recently did voiD [4] with it and are  
> (beside
> minor issues) very happy with it.

I'm as interested in proving statements true or false (under given  
theories) and checking theories for mistakes and inconsistencies as in  
writing down definitions. What we really need is something like  
Protege 4 but on the web. Does Neologism support OWL?  DL reasoning?

Jonathan

Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 19:34:05 UTC