- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 11:58:05 -0400
- To: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la>, "Streif, Rudolf" <rstreif@partner.jaguarlandrover.com>
- Cc: Benedict Whittam Smith <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-autowebplatform <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Thank you Renato. In addition to profile example I as was Rudi wondering how widely ODRL is implemented. I found your page for CG group and wonder if there are any updates in the last few years. https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/implementations/ We have a proof of concept from two companies that handles mechanics using Oauth to capture consent and enforce access limitations however I feel we may need a policy language for when we are faced with various scenarios like accessing information from multiple data providers, portability of data from one provider to another, transference of access rights to a new party. On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 21:20 +1000, Renato Iannella wrote: > Hi Ted…in relation to the below… > > ODRL 2.2 is “profile-focussed” in which a community (such as auto) > would develop the vocab (and/or reuse some of the ODRL vocab terms) > and plug those into the ODRL Model to make expressions (such as > agreements, offers, or your own type). > > News and media are one of the major interested parties in ODRL, but > the model is agnostic to industries. > > The CG is now running with promoting ODRL 2.2 to wider communities > and collecting/fostering the development of Profiles. > > (An example is the draft RighstML Profile: http://iptc.org/std-dev/Ri > ghtsML/2018.1/iptc-rightsml-std.html > for the news industry) > > The CG would be the best place to start discussions… > > Cheers - Renato > > > > On 11 Jul 2018, at 23:12, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> wrote: > > > > Wiki has the areas under consideration for exploration listed. > > Presently most of the interest is around consent capture, data > > contracts and ontology work on the data model. > > > > https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/Data_tf > > > > I was encouraged to take a look at ORDL and met with Ivan. It > > looks very pertinent for granularly representing the types of > > relationships we want for indicating what information can be > > shared with which third parties plus some of our other potential > > needs. My understanding from Ivan is customized profiles for > > different purposes are necessary and you might be able to point > > me to one. > > > > The impression Ivan had is that ORDL has seen uptake in news and > > media industry. Is there wider interest or any more generic and > > ideally open source implementations? Commercial options also of > > interest but experimenting would be facilitated by something more > > readily available. > > > > I am pleased to hear the work on a next version is continuing in a > > CG. > > If this seems pertinent, or to explore further if it might be, some > > of > > us would like to attend a CG call or invite you to one of our task > > force calls. > > -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Automotive Lead http://www.w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2018 15:58:13 UTC