- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 04:05:04 +0900
- To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
- Cc: "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9UaMvJufpOVW9RkcXMP9RTiwcNf6iXUWcW3pGb7vSYP4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:50 AM, 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr> wrote: > Kaz, > > Demos @ CES is not just OCF automotive demo. It’s W3C-OCF collaboration > demo. It has W3C vehicle server based on current spec as well as the client > web apps for smartphone. > > So could you revise the name of the demo like this? > fixed. Sorry for the vagueness. I've added your note above as well to the minutes. Please see: https://www.w3.org/2017/01/10-auto-minutes.html#item05 Thanks, Kazuyuki > > > Thanks! > > > > Best regards, > > Wonsuk. > > > > *From:* Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@w3.org] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2017 3:40 AM > *To:* public-autowebplatform@w3.org > *Subject:* [auto-bg] minutes - 10 January 2017 > > > > available at: > https://www.w3.org/2017/01/10-auto-minutes.html > > also as text below. > > Thanks, > > Kazuyuki > > --- > [1]W3C > > [1] http://www.w3.org/ > > - DRAFT - > > Automotive BG > > 10 Jan 2017 > > [2]Agenda > > [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/ > 2017Jan/0001.html > > See also: [3]IRC log > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/10-auto-irc > > Attendees > > Present > Ted, Kaz, PatrickL, PhilippeR, QingAn, Ryan, Wonsuk, > ParickB, Adam, Rudi, Paul, Urata > > Regrets > Chair > Wonsuk, QingAn, Paul > > Scribe > kaz > > Contents > > * [4]Topics > 1. [5]LBS update > 2. [6]Media tuner update > 3. [7]VIWI proposal > 4. [8]Topics for new use cases > 5. [9]OCF demo at CES > * [10]Summary of Action Items > * [11]Summary of Resolutions > __________________________________________________________ > > LBS update > > wonsuk: LBS update from QingAn first > > qingan: trying to organize LBS work > ... discussion for upcoming meetings > > wonsuk: could you please clarify your plan? > > qingan: maybe need some support from Philippe Colliot from > Genivi > ... will talk with him offline > ... plus thinking to start draft document on GitHub or > somewhere > > wonsuk: that's possible > ... we have GitHub > ... would be better to use that > ... maybe we need to create a sub directory for LBS? > > qingan: yes > ... restructure the structure > > wonsuk: if you have some sub directory within our GitHub, > please create a README.md to introduce your work > ... including roadmap etc. > ... would be great for the group > > qingan: ok. will do > > wonsuk: any comments? > > adam: what if we create a list of interest > ... a high level list > > qingan: high-level description? > > adam: yes > > qingan: maybe some diagram would be helpful as well > > adam: yes > > Media tuner update > > wonsuk: next media tuner > ... Ryan? > > ryan: working with the TV Control API WG > ... also we have VIWI proposal now > > <rdavis> > [12]https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/images/d/ > d8/Mediatuner_Resource_approach.pptx > > [12] https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/images/d/ > d8/Mediatuner_Resource_approach.pptx > > ryan: recently, I posted a media resource approach proposal > ... disability of resources > ... still discussion on the TV group list > ... looking at more RESTful approach > ... briefly reviewed the VIWI proposal > ... bringing up some specific use cases > > patrickL: feel free to contact PatrickB and me > > patrickB: we have a lot of more definitions > ... we have some experience on different topics on tuner > capability > ... so don't hesitate to talk with us > > wonsuk: tx, Ryan and Patricks > ... want to ask Patricks if you can join the media tf > ... so that you can talk about the media tuner topic with Ryan > more closely > > patrickL: of course > > patrickB: ok > > wonsuk: great > ... any comments? > ... one question from me > ... some kind of roadmap for the media tuner work as well > ... good to clarify roadmaps for all our work items > ... Ryan, do you have any roadmap information handy? > > ryan: we have a media tuner wiki page > ... we need to look at that again > > <rdavis> > [13]https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/Main_Page > /MediaTunerTaskForce > > [13] https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/Main_ > Page/MediaTunerTaskForce > > wonsuk: Patricks would like to join the media tf, so good to > update the page > > ted: thank you for your work, Ryan > ... trying to get more people for the media tuner work > ... feel free to hold a dedicated call for the TF if needed > ... Kaz and I can set it up > > wonsuk: tx > ... any comments? > > <ted> [also happy to join as many of these breakout tf meetings > as i can] > > <kaz> +1 :) > > VIWI proposal > > wonsuk: we got VIWI proposal > ... as Ted sent to the group, we need to investigate more > ... might want to create a TF > > <ted> [14]coordination wiki for ViWi > > [14] https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/ViWi > > wonsuk: also might want to have a dedicated TF call for that > > patrickL: sounds good :) > > wonsuk: we need to create a page for that > ... and clarify the roadmap > ... document of our review for the VIWI proposal > ... any comments? > > ryan: what is the point for the review? > > patrickL: what we propose already works > > <ted> [15]proposed path from Rudi > > [15] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-automotive/ > 2016Nov/0004.html > > patrickL: good idea to compare use cases for the two kinds of > interface, W3C Automotive and VIWI > > ryan: ok > > ted: Rudi's proposal (link above) > ... test, transition plan, etc. > ... we'll start discussion on the architecture > ... also have some architecture critics from some Member > ... VIWI proposal include HTTP and WebSocket > ... there is the TAG within W3C which works on architectural > design for Web technology > > ryan: tx for your information > > wonsuk: any other question? > > patrickB: how do we want to proceed? > ... protocol comparison > > ted: this BG call handles high-level discussion > ... detailed discussion should be handled by the TF > ... e.g., based on the use cases > ... can get availability for the TF call of people using > Doodle, etc. > > patrickB: ok > > wonsuk: Ted, you've already made a page for the VIWI TF > > -> [16]VIWI TF page > > [16] https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/ViWi > > ted: people can join the TF > ... we can find a time which works for the participants > ... can get quick indication of availability using Doodle > > wonsuk: how about sending another email to get feedback on > people's interest > > ted: will send out a Doodle poll > > <PatrickLue> Tuesdays somewhere around the other calls > > <PatrickLue> Mondays as well > > ted: thinks both the Patricks and Adam are interested in the TF > ... will send a Doodle concentrating on Mondays based on > people's availability > > patrickB: would be good to involve non-automotive people as > well > > ted: yes > ... maybe every other week or once a week > > kaz: maybe it would be better to prepare a doodle poll not only > for Monday but all for the 5 days to make sure given we'd like > to involve other people than OEMs too > ... also we need to clarify the moderator for the TF as well > > ted: talk about the detail later > > Topics for new use cases > > wonsuk: any other topics? > ... we need to keep gathering use cases and discuss them > ... would like to get feedback from you > > scribenick: ted > > kaz: Paul generated a list of topics and perhaps we can revisit > that list > > [17]Paul's topics on the wiki > > [17] https://www.w3.org/community/autowebplatform/wiki/ > Potential_Work_Areas > > scribenick: kaz > > ted: topics of interest include payments > ... had a joint meeting during TPAC > ... payments from automotive > ... would very much appreciate if you could introduce your > managers, partners, etc. > ... to get auto-centric use cases > ... please introduce me to people appropriate in your > organizations > > OCF demo at CES > > wonsuk: would like to show a video > ... OCF Automotive project > ... to make a standard for communication between automotive and > IoT > > <wonsuk_> [18]https://youtu.be/V_r3L1b5qs8 > > [18] https://youtu.be/V_r3L1b5qs8 > > wonsuk: we made a demo and showed it at CES > ... link above > ... please take a look > ... any other topics for today? > > (none) > > [ adjourned ] > > Summary of Action Items > > Summary of Resolutions > > [End of minutes] > __________________________________________________________ > > > Minutes formatted by David Booth's [19]scribe.perl version > 1.148 ([20]CVS log) > $Date: 2017/01/10 18:26:43 $ > > [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm > [20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ > > -- Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, WoT, TV, MMI and Geo Tel: +81 3 3516 2504
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:06:20 UTC