Re: Vehicle/Data spec section on "compliance"

Perhaps this information would be better placed under a "Testing" section?

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Rees, Kevron <> wrote:
> It has been pointed out to me that it may not be necessarily clear
> what exactly is required by the spec and what is not.  Should we add a
> section that describes what a minimum implementation would contain?
> According to my understanding the following APIs are the required
> minimum:
> 1. Entire Vehicle Information Access API except history
> 2. All Vehicle interface attributes (ie, vehicle.vehicleSpeed,
> vehicle.climateControl, etc.)
> Attributes on specific data type interfaces are not required.  What is
> supported by the system should be accessed through the Availability
> API.
> Thoughts?
> -Kevron

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 16:51:26 UTC