W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > September 2020

[Fwd: Re: RPC protocols and the path forward.]

From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:59:34 -0400
Message-ID: <eababe7ad13ea7f6fd8331066d37ca3d8d3bc5cd.camel@w3.org>
To: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Cc: Tobias Oberstein <tobias.oberstein@crossbario.com>
Forwarding to public-automotive, public-automotive-request used to
subscribe/unsubscribe to the list (for those not in the database for
the group)

Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead

attached mail follows:

> Tobias offered to give this group an overview of WAMP and to take a
> look at our Gen2 effort to give his thoughts on how they may possibly
> merge.
> https://w3c.github.io/automotive/spec/Gen2_Core.html
> https://w3c.github.io/automotive/spec/Gen2_Transport.html

fwiw, I've looked through these 2 specs (and the VSS). anticipating the 
actual wamp presentation, here are my first thoughts on mapping vss/gen2 
to wamp specifically:


but an outright mapping as I understood is not necessarily a goal. 
anyways, might be useful nevertheless ..


a naive question though:

did anyone actually ever implement a working prototype 

did 2 independent prototypes ever talk to each other?

did anyone put on an app developer hat and scrutinized whether the API 
and all that "feels right" (for an app developer)?

^ as in: "rough consensus PLUS working code" ;)

IMO spec authors should both be the first implementors and the first 
users. to make sure, the stuff actually works and fits needs.

Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2020 10:59:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 29 September 2020 10:59:39 UTC