Re: Agenda points for WG tomorrow

Hi Isaac,
I think your proposal to look at a few use cases is a good idea.
I hope we can discuss at least what use cases to use on the meeting
tomorrow when you have joined.
BR
Ulf

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 17:31 Isaac Agudo Ruiz <isaac@lcc.uma.es> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have checked the diagram and I agree with it. Anyway, I think we also
> need examples of some policies written using the different approaches
> mentioned in our discussions. I’m sorry but I haven’t been able to advance
> on this. I image we could try to define some basic use cases that showcase
> the differences of purposes approaches. For example:
>
> Use Case 1:
>
> Owner's App wants to access speed from inside car in order to advise of
> speed limits.
>
> Use Case 2:
>
> Mechanic’s App wants to access diagnostics codes from inside car.
>
> Use Case 3:
>
> Manufacturer's App wants to access diagnostics codes from outside car in
> order to monitor engine health and give advice to owner.
>
> I will be late tomorrow, I am having class (over Teams) until 20:30 CET,
> but I’ll try to finish a bit earlier.
>
> Best,
>
> Isaac.
>
> El 30 mar 2020, a las 15:32, Ulf Bjorkengren <ulfbjorkengren@geotab.com>
> escribió:
>
> We said some time ago in the access control discussion that we should put
> together use case examples to try to make our points clearer. The link
> below points to an attempt to do so.
> I hope we can discuss it in the WG tomorrow.
>
> Where I also hope we can find a slot for the PR 323, which is now updated
> after Gunnar's comments.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZdC4TDW0dsPcprTsEYRZC2CeFf6UpNQWuCj1wdtlQWg/edit?usp=sharing
>
> BR
> Ulf
> --
> Ulf Bjorkengren
> *Geotab*
> Senior Connectivity Strategist | Ph. D.
> Mobile +45 53562142
> Visit www.geotab.com
>
>
>
>
>