- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:19:28 -0400
- To: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <09783127768909f7b42d1433d6e8badf37c5d680.camel@w3.org>
We have been stuck on one topic far and may come down to a ballot
https://github.com/w3c/automotive/pull/298
Related minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2019/03/26-auto-minutes.html
https://www.w3.org/2019/03/19-auto-minutes.html
https://www.w3.org/2019/03/12-auto-minutes.html
My thoughts on questions below, the ballot will allow for comments on
Y/N and select questions.
Is your understanding Gen2 is meant for exposing data using VSS as the
data model? Y/N
Which version? VSS1
VSS2
VSS-other
Should the Gen2 spec use stronger language expressing alignment with
VSS? (there may be comments in spec based on other questions results)
Y/N
Should Gen2 allow for other data models for vehicle signals? (Separate
data models can be used for other "domains" for eg media, location,
etc) Y/N
Does the WG agree that should there be an impassible obstacle with VSS
that it will fork? Y/N
Does the WG agree that we should have a concept of having a frozen
snapshot make sense for Gen2 as we have done for VISS? (VSS1 tree)? Y/N
--
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
http://www.w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2019 22:19:33 UTC