W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > January 2018

Re: Draft Auto WG recharter

From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:21:33 -0500
Message-ID: <1517343693.2690.229.camel@w3.org>
To: "Luennemann, Patrick (CQTM)" <patrick.luennemann@carmeq.com>, Peter Winzell <peterwinzell.gbg@gmail.com>, public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Cc: Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
Next week we will have a presentation on Neutral Vehicles, more
ambitious than the ISO20078 activity we heard about last Fall.

We hopefully will have time to address the charter as well if we do not
conclude via GH+mail. 

Here is an issue to align with your pull request

https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/256 

I am in agreement with the latest proposed changes and see an edit from
Gunnar as well as a pull request.

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 07:27 +0000, Luennemann, Patrick (CQTM) wrote:
> Hello Peter and the rest of the group,
>  
> How is this normally handled by the W3C?
> I just forked the charter to work on it and get comments on my
> proposed version before we discuss it together in the group.
>  
> Would an issue “charter 2018/19” be created normally which is the
> hook to change something on the automotive repository (the charter
> document)?
>  
> I am looking forward to next week’s phone call to go through the
> charter. Either as a pull request, in the forked repository or in
> whatever form is typically used in the w3c.
>  
> Best regards
> Patrick
>  
> --
> Patrick Lünnemann
> CQTM / Carmeq GmbH
> Telefon: +49 160 901 319 84
>  
> From: Peter Winzell [mailto:peterwinzell.gbg@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Dienstag, 30. Januar 2018 04:49
> To: Luennemann, Patrick (CQTM) <patrick.luennemann@carmeq.com>; Paul
> Boyes <pb@opencar.com>
> Cc: T Guild <ted@w3.org>; public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org
> >
> Subject: Re: Draft Auto WG recharter
>  
> Hi Patrick! 
> Thank you for starting the new work on the re-charter!
>  
>  
> I had some comments but I really don’t like these email chains , do
> we have a github issue for the recharter ? I can’t seem to find one
> now, but I thought Paul B mentioned one ?. 
> In general my comment is that we should of course have a name of the
> re-charter that can be understood as Gunnar mention below. That
> aside, I also believe that our greatest challenge is to marry
> subscription type signals and the more resource pull type of data.  
>  
> Looking forward to be working with the new charter!
>  
> Peter W 
> 
> 
> > On 25 Jan 2018, at 12:49, Paul Boyes <Paul.Boyes@inrix.com> wrote:
> >  
> > Here are my thoughts:
> >  
> > --Perhaps a phone working session on the charter might be helpful?
> >  
> > —With RSI subsume VISS?  Will they remain separate?  It is not
> > clear from the current draft.
> >  
> > —I agree with PatrickL’s move away from the term Infotainment to
> > Vehicle Function. (See comments on Patrick’s pull request).
> >  
> > —I suggest we revisit scope.  It is ok, but could likely be cleaned
> > up.
> >  
> > Otherwise, it is looking good to me.
> >  
> > Thanks,
> >  
> > Paul
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Paul J. Boyes | INRIX | Director of Telematics and Standards -
> > OpenCar  |  206-276-9675 | paul.boyes@inrix.com | www.inrix.com
> > 
> > 
> > > On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> wrote:
> > >  
> > > Here is the start of draft re-charter for Auto WG 
> > > 
> > > http://w3c.github.io/automotive/charter-2018.html
> > > 
> > > The @@ indicate dates are pending for VISS to CR. I expect us to
> > > publish VISS before sending this charter to the AC. I welcome
> > > input and
> > > will seek review from W3C Management before sending to the AC.
> > > 
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Systems Team
http://www.w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2018 20:21:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:06:03 UTC