W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > September 2017

Re: wwwivi (was Re: WG call 2017-09-05)

From: Gavigan, Kevin <kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:37:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaHsmebSitsptsQdZ6Qow7pHVFs6Psn9xxPTiQbipBN7i9T-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>
Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Hi Ted,

Thanks very much for raising this within W3C - one other salient point that
I've added on a different thread, is that suggest that we need to be able
to support more than one VIS Server implementation on the same local
vehicle network.

For example, what if cluster team decided to use a VIS Server to manage
access to  CAN data mainly for clients running on cluster, but also wants
to support making data available to the odd client running somewhere else
on the local vehicle network. Then, what if Infotainment System designers
also did the same thing - added VIS Server mainly to support infotainment
but also to support clients elsewhere on vehicle network.

Thanks and regards,

Kev

*Kevin Gavigan BSc, MSc, PhD, MCP, MCTS*
*Software Architect*
*Connected Infotainment*
*Electrical, Electronic and Software Engineering (EESE)*
Jaguar Land Rover


*Mobile: 07990 084866*
*Email:* kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com

*Office address:*
GO03/057 • Building 523, Gaydon • Maildrop: (G03)
Jaguar Land Rover • Banbury Road • Gaydon • Warwick • CV35 0RR

On 11 September 2017 at 22:09, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> wrote:

> mDNS was an early response from my colleague in the TAG.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762
>
> We discussed, but not finding it in the minutes, discovery/broadcast in
> the past. Does anyone recall arguments against?
>
> On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 16:03 -0400, Ted Guild wrote:
> > Kevin had asked me to try to get a final resolution on this recurring
> > topic that has always been awkward for us. Hyojin has also suggested
> > escalating a decision.
> >
> > As I recall Junichi got .localdomain (not reserved TLD) or .localhost
> > suggestion from Web of Things folks and that we would need to go with
> > self signed certs.
> >
> > I sought advice from some colleagues who suggested I raise it to W3C
> > TAG which I have done. I will keep the group appraised and if they
> > want
> > us to join a call with them will see who is interested in attending
> > from our side.
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:05 +0100, Gavigan, Kevin wrote:
> > >
> > > Re: https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/223
> >
> >
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Systems Team
> http://www.w3.org
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 08:38:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 October 2017 18:52:54 UTC