RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

Rudi.
CfC doesn’t need to have a phone call. Typically an email is as usual for this. It’s an official process for gathering feedbacks from WG members whether they think current editor’s draft is enough to be published official W3C FPWD. Refer to [1]. It’s example for CfC from System Applications WG. We can use a same sentence with small changes like specification name, duration, etc.

Anyway I think it would be great if you or peter would send the CfC email to the group!
Thanks!

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Oct/0030.html


Kind regards,
Wonsuk.

From: Streif, Rudolf [mailto:rstreif@jaguarlandrover.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:39 PM
To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec


Hi Wonsuk,

I am out of the office today, Wednesday October 5. Friday would work best for me for a short telco.

Thank you,
Rudi

On Oct 4, 2016 6:59 PM, "이원석" <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr<mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>> wrote:
Hi. All.
In the last TPAC meeting we had a consensus to publish the FPWD for vehicle signal server spec at 11th October. Because we really want to do this before GENIVI AMM meeting in Burlingame. To achieving this, we need to have CfC(Call for Consensus) process for the spec as soon as possible.

Chairs! (Paul, Rudi and Peter)
I guess it would be perfect if you do this with short term CfC today or tomorrow!

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Wonsuk.
=========================================
이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Senior Researcher, Ph.D
한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터(Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI)
Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997   Office: +82-42-860-6104
E-mail: wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr<mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
=========================================