Re: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings

Great.  Let's do it then.

Paul J Boyes
206-276-9675

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com> wrote:
> 
> Works for me. 
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 04:28, Paul Boyes wrote:
>> Right after lunch on Monday?  Does that work for everyone?
>> 
>> Paul J. Boyes
>> --------------------------------
>> Mobile:   206-276-9675
>> Skype:  pauljboyes
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 21, 2015, at 4:57 AM, Tobie Langel
>> <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com<mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Wonsuk,
>> 
>> Thanks for your kind comments.
>> 
>> Monday would work for me.
>> 
>> Are there any documents I should have a look at before the meeting?
>> 
>> Looking forward to see you there!
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> --tobie
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:58, ÀÌ¿ø¼® wrote:
>> Hi. Tobie.
>> Most of all congrats for FPWD of generic sensor API! And thanks for
>> inviting breakout session for generic sensor APIs in Tech plenary day.
>> 
>> By the way in the aspect of automotive WG it would be great if you could
>> join the automotive WG f2f meeting in Monday or Tuesday afternoon during
>> TPAC week. We would like to have deeply discussion with you based on
>> below agenda. Is it working with you, Tobie?
>> 
>> Tentative Agenda
>> ? Intro and status about Generic sensor API
>> ? Use cases from automotive sensors
>> ? Open discussion on alignment between automotive spec and generic sensor
>> api
>> ? Opinion about Vehicle Info/Data API
>> ? Experience of API test case for W3C REC
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Kr,
>> Wonsuk.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tobie Langel [mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 7:33 PM
>> To: public-automotive@w3.org<mailto:public-automotive@w3.org>
>> Subject: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Quick update to let you know that we have released a FPWD of the Generic
>> Sensor API earlier this week[1]. Note the editor's draft[2] and GitHub
>> Issues[3] are still where most of the action is going on, so you
>> definitely should keep an eye on those if you want to follow the spec
>> closely.
>> 
>> The goal of the Generic Sensor API is to promote consistency across
>> sensor APIs and increase the pace at which they can be exposed to the
>> Web by simplifying both the specification and implementation processes.
>> I'm convinced the Generic Sensor API would be a great fit for exposing
>> automotive sensors to the Web (see the checking the tire pressure
>> example I've added to the spec[4]) and would love to collect your
>> feedback on this topic.
>> 
>> As previously announced, we'll be holding a breakout session[5] and ad-
>> hoc meeting[6] at TPAC. You're welcome to join both.
>> 
>> I'll be arriving early (on Friday the 23rd) and would be most happy to
>> meet and chat with some of you then.
>> 
>> All the best,
>> 
>> --tobie
>> 
>> ---
>> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/

>> [2]: http://w3c.github.io/sensors/

>> [3]: https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues

>> [4]:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/#example-007a202d

>> [5]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2015/SessionIdeas#Generic_Sensor_API

>> [6]:
>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2015/ad-hoc-meetings#Generic_Sensor_API

>> 
>> 

Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2015 08:28:37 UTC