Re: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings

Works for me. 

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 04:28, Paul Boyes wrote:
> Right after lunch on Monday?  Does that work for everyone?
> 
> Paul J. Boyes
> --------------------------------
> Mobile:   206-276-9675
> Skype:  pauljboyes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 4:57 AM, Tobie Langel
> <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com<mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>>
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Wonsuk,
> 
> Thanks for your kind comments.
> 
> Monday would work for me.
> 
> Are there any documents I should have a look at before the meeting?
> 
> Looking forward to see you there!
> 
> Best,
> 
> --tobie
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:58, 이원석 wrote:
> Hi. Tobie.
> Most of all congrats for FPWD of generic sensor API! And thanks for
> inviting breakout session for generic sensor APIs in Tech plenary day.
> 
> By the way in the aspect of automotive WG it would be great if you could
> join the automotive WG f2f meeting in Monday or Tuesday afternoon during
> TPAC week. We would like to have deeply discussion with you based on
> below agenda. Is it working with you, Tobie?
> 
> Tentative Agenda
> ? Intro and status about Generic sensor API
> ? Use cases from automotive sensors
> ? Open discussion on alignment between automotive spec and generic sensor
> api
> ? Opinion about Vehicle Info/Data API
> ? Experience of API test case for W3C REC
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kr,
> Wonsuk.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tobie Langel [mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 7:33 PM
> To: public-automotive@w3.org<mailto:public-automotive@w3.org>
> Subject: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Quick update to let you know that we have released a FPWD of the Generic
> Sensor API earlier this week[1]. Note the editor's draft[2] and GitHub
> Issues[3] are still where most of the action is going on, so you
> definitely should keep an eye on those if you want to follow the spec
> closely.
> 
> The goal of the Generic Sensor API is to promote consistency across
> sensor APIs and increase the pace at which they can be exposed to the
> Web by simplifying both the specification and implementation processes.
> I'm convinced the Generic Sensor API would be a great fit for exposing
> automotive sensors to the Web (see the checking the tire pressure
> example I've added to the spec[4]) and would love to collect your
> feedback on this topic.
> 
> As previously announced, we'll be holding a breakout session[5] and ad-
> hoc meeting[6] at TPAC. You're welcome to join both.
> 
> I'll be arriving early (on Friday the 23rd) and would be most happy to
> meet and chat with some of you then.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> --tobie
> 
> ---
> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/
> [2]: http://w3c.github.io/sensors/
> [3]: https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues
> [4]:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/#example-007a202d
> [5]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2015/SessionIdeas#Generic_Sensor_API
> [6]:
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2015/ad-hoc-meetings#Generic_Sensor_API
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2015 08:21:30 UTC