Re: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings

Hi. Tobie.
Thanks a lot!

We have two specs as below. It would be really great if we could have your review for them, because you are one of real expert for Javascript!
Thanks in advance!

Vehicle Information Access API
http://rawgit.com/w3c/automotive/master/vehicle_data/vehicle_spec.html


Vehicle Data
http://rawgit.com/w3c/automotive/master/vehicle_data/data_spec.html



Kr,
Wonsuk.


2015. 10. 21., 오전 4:57, Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com<mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>> 작성:

Hi Wonsuk,

Thanks for your kind comments.

Monday would work for me.

Are there any documents I should have a look at before the meeting?

Looking forward to see you there!

Best,

--tobie


On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:58, 이원석 wrote:
Hi. Tobie.
Most of all congrats for FPWD of generic sensor API! And thanks for
inviting breakout session for generic sensor APIs in Tech plenary day.

By the way in the aspect of automotive WG it would be great if you could
join the automotive WG f2f meeting in Monday or Tuesday afternoon during
TPAC week. We would like to have deeply discussion with you based on
below agenda. Is it working with you, Tobie?

Tentative Agenda
? Intro and status about Generic sensor API
? Use cases from automotive sensors
? Open discussion on alignment between automotive spec and generic sensor
api
? Opinion about Vehicle Info/Data API
? Experience of API test case for W3C REC

Thanks!

Kr,
Wonsuk.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tobie Langel [mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 7:33 PM
To: public-automotive@w3.org<mailto:public-automotive@w3.org>
Subject: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings

Hi all,

Quick update to let you know that we have released a FPWD of the Generic
Sensor API earlier this week[1]. Note the editor's draft[2] and GitHub
Issues[3] are still where most of the action is going on, so you
definitely should keep an eye on those if you want to follow the spec
closely.

The goal of the Generic Sensor API is to promote consistency across
sensor APIs and increase the pace at which they can be exposed to the
Web by simplifying both the specification and implementation processes.
I'm convinced the Generic Sensor API would be a great fit for exposing
automotive sensors to the Web (see the checking the tire pressure
example I've added to the spec[4]) and would love to collect your
feedback on this topic.

As previously announced, we'll be holding a breakout session[5] and ad-
hoc meeting[6] at TPAC. You're welcome to join both.

I'll be arriving early (on Friday the 23rd) and would be most happy to
meet and chat with some of you then.

All the best,

--tobie

---
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/

[2]: http://w3c.github.io/sensors/

[3]: https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues

[4]:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/#example-007a202d

[5]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2015/SessionIdeas#Generic_Sensor_API

[6]:
https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2015/ad-hoc-meetings#Generic_Sensor_API