W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > October 2015

Re: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:57:32 +0200
Message-Id: <1445371052.104280.415637697.7F1D693C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
Cc: public-automotive@w3.org, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>, Adam Abramski <adam.m.abramski@intel.com>, ted@w3.org, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Hi Wonsuk,

Thanks for your kind comments.

Monday would work for me. 

Are there any documents I should have a look at before the meeting?

Looking forward to see you there!

Best,

--tobie


On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:58, 이원석 wrote:
> Hi. Tobie.
> Most of all congrats for FPWD of generic sensor API! And thanks for
> inviting breakout session for generic sensor APIs in Tech plenary day.
> 
> By the way in the aspect of automotive WG it would be great if you could
> join the automotive WG f2f meeting in Monday or Tuesday afternoon during
> TPAC week. We would like to have deeply discussion with you based on
> below agenda. Is it working with you, Tobie?
>  
> Tentative Agenda
> ? Intro and status about Generic sensor API
> ? Use cases from automotive sensors
> ? Open discussion on alignment between automotive spec and generic sensor
> api
> ? Opinion about Vehicle Info/Data API
> ? Experience of API test case for W3C REC
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kr,
> Wonsuk.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tobie Langel [mailto:tobie@sensors.codespeaks.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 7:33 PM
> > To: public-automotive@w3.org
> > Subject: [generic sensor] FPWD & TPAC meetings
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Quick update to let you know that we have released a FPWD of the Generic
> > Sensor API earlier this week[1]. Note the editor's draft[2] and GitHub
> > Issues[3] are still where most of the action is going on, so you
> > definitely should keep an eye on those if you want to follow the spec
> > closely.
> > 
> > The goal of the Generic Sensor API is to promote consistency across
> > sensor APIs and increase the pace at which they can be exposed to the
> > Web by simplifying both the specification and implementation processes.
> > I'm convinced the Generic Sensor API would be a great fit for exposing
> > automotive sensors to the Web (see the checking the tire pressure
> > example I've added to the spec[4]) and would love to collect your
> > feedback on this topic.
> > 
> > As previously announced, we'll be holding a breakout session[5] and ad-
> > hoc meeting[6] at TPAC. You're welcome to join both.
> > 
> > I'll be arriving early (on Friday the 23rd) and would be most happy to
> > meet and chat with some of you then.
> > 
> > All the best,
> > 
> > --tobie
> > 
> > ---
> > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/
> > [2]: http://w3c.github.io/sensors/
> > [3]: https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues
> > [4]:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-generic-sensor-20151015/#example-007a202d
> > [5]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2015/SessionIdeas#Generic_Sensor_API
> > [6]:
> > https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2015/ad-hoc-meetings#Generic_Sensor_API
> 
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 19:58:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 October 2017 18:52:44 UTC