RE: Review: Rule template

+1

 

​​​​​

 

 

 

* katie *

 

Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)

 

Cell: 703-371-5545 |  <mailto:ryladog@gmail.com> ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA |  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 |  <https://twitter.com/Ryladog> @ryladog

 

From: Gunderson, Jon R [mailto:jongund@illinois.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:43 PM
To: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>; Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Review: Rule template

 

I would suggest a slightly different format:

 

Summary: Short title to uniquely identify the rule from other rules

Required: True or False (some rules maybe considered best practices or maybe required in the future)

Description: Longer description of what the rule is testing

Primary Success Criteria: SC that is deemed most related to the rule (e.g. think of rules related to headings or landmarks)

Secondary Success Criteria: SC that are related to the rule (e.g. think of rules related to headings or landmarks) 

Target elements: What elements are applicable to the rule

Techniques: A list of techniques that can be used to satisfy the rule with pointers

Procedures: A list of manual check procedures  required or may be required based on the evaluation of content of a document

 

Rule result options:

1.       Violation 

2.       Warning

3.       Manual Check

4.       Pass

5.       Not applicable (e.g. no target results found)

 

Jon

 

 

From: Wilco Fiers [mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 11:08 AM
To: Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org <mailto:public-auto-wcag@w3.org> >
Subject: Review: Rule template

 

Hi all,

Github is having some issues at the moment, so I just wanted to pass this to you for review for tomorrow's call:

https://github.com/WilcoFiers/auto-wcag/commit/934edd172b416367584008ff4ee5af09d058bed1 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_WilcoFiers_auto-2Dwcag_commit_934edd172b416367584008ff4ee5af09d058bed1&d=DQMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=REZD8fc2AwufInstfW3L5jSLVS8bjZtAodDOhat7yAI&m=jwP9OEw0BZRH4mHdiEbLCnlawEMeRg4MgJslXZQ7100&s=1j076GCCDsZVJjw4sxTCBajBAdf2EifO11w3vILI5no&e=> 

 

It's an updated version of the rule format. Let me know what you think!

 

-- 

Wilco Fiers - Senior Accessibility Engineer