Re: Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce proposal

*nothing that changes the *meaning* of the text. Is what I meant to say.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:

> Thanks Emma! I've made a few editorial changes based on your feedback.
> Nothing changing the actual text.
>
> Wilco
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Emma Pratt Richens <
> Emma.Richens@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Wilco,
>>
>> It all looks good to me, including the addition of the ePub stuff.
>>
>> I spotted a few minor typos that may affect meaning, so hope you don’t
>> mind me pointing them out:
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/Accessibility_Conformance_Testing_for_W3C
>>
>>    - ACT Rule Suite Repository ... should it read (non) conformance?
>>    - Project Outline, last sentence of first paragraph ... therefore
>>    spelling and in missing after result.
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/ACT_Deliverables
>>
>>    - Rule validation ... should it read "How to ensure no (unexpected)
>>    false positives?
>>    - Act Rule Suite ... should it read (non) conformance?  and less
>>    accurate ruleS?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> -- -- --
>> Emma J Pratt Richens
>> Senior Accessibility Specialist
>>
>> BBC Digital, UX&D
>> Floor 4, Bridge House, MediaCityUK
>>
>>
>> *"**Open your eyes and then open your eyes again.**"*
>>
>> From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
>> Date: Friday, 10 June 2016 08:38
>> To: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
>> Cc: "public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>, George Kerscher
>> <kerscher@montana.com>
>> Subject: Re: Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce
>> proposal
>> Resent-From: <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Friday, 10 June 2016 08:39
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> As per Avneesh suggestion, I made a small change to the scope section:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/index.php?title=Accessibility_Conformance_Testing_for_W3C&diff=2441&oldid=2439
>>
>> Wilco
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Wilco! may be also write PWP along with EPUB, because there is a
>>> chance that digital publishing shape up as PWP in future.
>>> - Different digital publishing technologies (such as EPUB, PWP etc.)
>>>
>>> With regards
>>> Avneesh
>>> *From:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 18:30
>>> *To:* Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
>>> *Cc:* public-auto-wcag@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce
>>> proposal
>>>
>>> Hi Avneesh,
>>>
>>> I think that's an excellent suggestion. I propose adding an item to the
>>> "ACT-Rules can be created to test"  list that says:
>>> - Different digital publishing technologies (such as EPUB)
>>>
>>> Wilco
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Wilco,
>>>>
>>>> The proposal looks very good!
>>>> As we know that digital publishing is becoming a priority for W3C,
>>>> dPUB working group is heavily involved in developing use cases (Romain
>>>> is also working on the use cases)
>>>> http://www.w3.org/dpub/
>>>>
>>>> ARIA extensions for digital publishing is being developed
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dpub-aam-1.0-20160317/
>>>>
>>>> We are working on EPUB accessibility specifications
>>>> http://www.idpf.org/epub/a11y/
>>>>
>>>> Which we wish to get into WCAG extensions some time in future
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-ext-req/
>>>>
>>>> My suggestion is that when digital publishing is becoming such an
>>>> important activity in W3C, should we mentioned it explicitly in the scope
>>>> and framework part of the proposal.
>>>> It will be great to develop a framework that also supports the tests
>>>> developed from digital publishing perspective.
>>>>
>>>> With regards
>>>> Avneesh
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 6, 2016 21:00
>>>> *To:* public-auto-wcag@w3.org
>>>> *Cc:* John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> ; schwer@us.ibm.com ;
>>>> maryjom@us.ibm.com ; jongund@illinois.edu ; e.velleman@accessibility.nl
>>>> ; Preety Kumar <preety.kumar@deque.com> ; Dylan Barrell
>>>> <dylan.barrell@deque.com> ; Shilpi Kapoor <shilpi@barrierbreak.com> ;
>>>> ueki@infoaxia.co.jp ; peter.wallack@oracle.com ; James Nurthen
>>>> <james.nurthen@oracle.com> ; Wendy Chisholm <wendc@microsoft.com> ; 王炜
>>>> <wangwei_eagle@zju.edu.cn> ; Katie Haritos-Shea
>>>> <katie.haritos-shea@deque.com> ; Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> ; Shadi
>>>> Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
>>>> *Subject:* Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce
>>>> proposal
>>>>
>>>> Dear Auto-WCAG members and others,
>>>>
>>>> Over the past few months, the Auto-WCAG community has been working on a
>>>> proposal to set up a new taskforce at the W3C. The Accessibility
>>>> Conformance Testing (ACT) taskforce. The aim of this task force would be to
>>>> develop a suite of rules that can be used during conformance testing to
>>>> accessibility standards. We aim to share this proposal with the chairs of
>>>> the WCAG Working Group by next week. But before we do so we ask you kindly
>>>> to send us your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> The proposal is made up of three documents.
>>>>
>>>> ACT for W3C, this outlines the proposal:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/Accessibility_Conformance_Testing_for_W3C
>>>>
>>>> ACT Task Force work statement
>>>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/ACT_Deliverables
>>>>
>>>> ACT Deliverables description
>>>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/ACT_Deliverables
>>>>
>>>> Please submit your feedback to the auto-wcag mailing list at
>>>> public-auto-wcag@w3.org by June 13th.
>>>>
>>>> Kind Regards
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>
>


-- 
*Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer