Re: Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce proposal

Thanks Emma! I've made a few editorial changes based on your feedback.
Nothing changing the actual text.

Wilco

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Emma Pratt Richens <Emma.Richens@bbc.co.uk
> wrote:

> Hi Wilco,
>
> It all looks good to me, including the addition of the ePub stuff.
>
> I spotted a few minor typos that may affect meaning, so hope you donโ€™t
> mind me pointing them out:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/Accessibility_Conformance_Testing_for_W3C
>
>    - ACT Rule Suite Repository ... should it read (non) conformance?
>    - Project Outline, last sentence of first paragraph ... therefore
>    spelling and in missing after result.
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/ACT_Deliverables
>
>    - Rule validation ... should it read "How to ensure no (unexpected)
>    false positives?
>    - Act Rule Suite ... should it read (non) conformance?  and less
>    accurate ruleS?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -- -- --
> Emma J Pratt Richens
> Senior Accessibility Specialist
>
> BBC Digital, UX&D
> Floor 4, Bridge House, MediaCityUK
>
>
> *"**Open your eyes and then open your eyes again.**"*
>
> From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
> Date: Friday, 10 June 2016 08:38
> To: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
> Cc: "public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>, George Kerscher <
> kerscher@montana.com>
> Subject: Re: Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce
> proposal
> Resent-From: <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Friday, 10 June 2016 08:39
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> As per Avneesh suggestion, I made a small change to the scope section:
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/index.php?title=Accessibility_Conformance_Testing_for_W3C&diff=2441&oldid=2439
>
> Wilco
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Wilco! may be also write PWP along with EPUB, because there is a
>> chance that digital publishing shape up as PWP in future.
>> - Different digital publishing technologies (such as EPUB, PWP etc.)
>>
>> With regards
>> Avneesh
>> *From:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 18:30
>> *To:* Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* public-auto-wcag@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce
>> proposal
>>
>> Hi Avneesh,
>>
>> I think that's an excellent suggestion. I propose adding an item to the
>> "ACT-Rules can be created to test"  list that says:
>> - Different digital publishing technologies (such as EPUB)
>>
>> Wilco
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Wilco,
>>>
>>> The proposal looks very good!
>>> As we know that digital publishing is becoming a priority for W3C,
>>> dPUB working group is heavily involved in developing use cases (Romain
>>> is also working on the use cases)
>>> http://www.w3.org/dpub/
>>>
>>> ARIA extensions for digital publishing is being developed
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dpub-aam-1.0-20160317/
>>>
>>> We are working on EPUB accessibility specifications
>>> http://www.idpf.org/epub/a11y/
>>>
>>> Which we wish to get into WCAG extensions some time in future
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-ext-req/
>>>
>>> My suggestion is that when digital publishing is becoming such an
>>> important activity in W3C, should we mentioned it explicitly in the scope
>>> and framework part of the proposal.
>>> It will be great to develop a framework that also supports the tests
>>> developed from digital publishing perspective.
>>>
>>> With regards
>>> Avneesh
>>>
>>> *From:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 6, 2016 21:00
>>> *To:* public-auto-wcag@w3.org
>>> *Cc:* John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> ; schwer@us.ibm.com ;
>>> maryjom@us.ibm.com ; jongund@illinois.edu ; e.velleman@accessibility.nl
>>> ; Preety Kumar <preety.kumar@deque.com> ; Dylan Barrell
>>> <dylan.barrell@deque.com> ; Shilpi Kapoor <shilpi@barrierbreak.com> ;
>>> ueki@infoaxia.co.jp ; peter.wallack@oracle.com ; James Nurthen
>>> <james.nurthen@oracle.com> ; Wendy Chisholm <wendc@microsoft.com> ; ็Ž‹็‚œ
>>> <wangwei_eagle@zju.edu.cn> ; Katie Haritos-Shea
>>> <katie.haritos-shea@deque.com> ; Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> ; Shadi
>>> Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
>>> *Subject:* Call to review, Accessibility Conformance Test taskforce
>>> proposal
>>>
>>> Dear Auto-WCAG members and others,
>>>
>>> Over the past few months, the Auto-WCAG community has been working on a
>>> proposal to set up a new taskforce at the W3C. The Accessibility
>>> Conformance Testing (ACT) taskforce. The aim of this task force would be to
>>> develop a suite of rules that can be used during conformance testing to
>>> accessibility standards. We aim to share this proposal with the chairs of
>>> the WCAG Working Group by next week. But before we do so we ask you kindly
>>> to send us your feedback.
>>>
>>> The proposal is made up of three documents.
>>>
>>> ACT for W3C, this outlines the proposal:
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/Accessibility_Conformance_Testing_for_W3C
>>>
>>> ACT Task Force work statement
>>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/ACT_Deliverables
>>>
>>> ACT Deliverables description
>>> https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/wiki/ACT_Deliverables
>>>
>>> Please submit your feedback to the auto-wcag mailing list at
>>> public-auto-wcag@w3.org by June 13th.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer
>
>


-- 
*Wilco Fiers* - Senior Accessibility Engineer

Received on Monday, 13 June 2016 20:13:35 UTC