- From: Jesse Beach <jesse.r.beach@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:51:56 +0000
- To: Wilco Fiers <w.fiers@accessibility.nl>, "public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGJ-1cGNz0FWvuH5MeW-g7UEF1FdVmF7s9AtUsVbhqvSv9XG3Q@mail.gmail.com>
I'm ambivalent. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:16 AM Wilco Fiers <w.fiers@accessibility.nl> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In the past few months I've heard from several people that they would like > to attend our weekly calls, but are unable because they have their own > weekly appointments on Thursday. I've also noticed that people who were > working on tests haven't been able to because they are unable to attend the > reviews. Which is really unfortunate I think. > > To make it a little easier for people to participate, I'm considering > alternating the day of the call. We could for example alternate between > Wednesday and Thursday. So the call would be on Thursday one week, then > Wednesday the next, then Thursday again the week after that, and so on. It > would make planning participation for people a little harder, and may mean > some of our regular Thursday attendees join less frequently. But I think > that as long as we can have enough people on the call for a review (which > we determined was four), it's probably worth getting more people in. > > We'll discuss the proposal in Thursday's call, but if you're not attending > and are interested to do so let me know what day you would prefer. We'll > decide if it's worth doing based on how many people would participate on a > different day. I think Wednesday or Friday would be best as it would still > put enough days between meetings to work on test cases.. Also if time is an > issue we could reconsider this for the different day, though from what I've > heard from people our current time works quite well for the time zones our > members are in. > > Regards > > Wilco Fiers > Accessibility Foundation NL >
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 17:52:23 UTC